When those datacenters are in your own jurisdiction, but the Global HQ of the company is in a different jurisdiction, then you have a problem. This is bigger than corporate vs individual interests.

What you're really saying in the first part of your comment is that there would need to be 'an independent google' for every jurisdiction. That isn't going to happen.

The current situation is a little different since:

"Each account holder resides in the United States, the crimes they are suspected of committing occurred solely in the United States, and the electronic data at issue was exchanged between persons located in the United States."

In this case it does seem reasonable that the company should comply.