Not true: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plu...
Not true: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plu...
Also, they recommend installing IE. So I'm assuming Edge isn't supported either? This is a horrible approach to browser security coming from Google.
[1] https://support.google.com/hangouts/answer/1361676?hl=en
https://www.cnet.com/news/in-chrome-googles-hangouts-plugin-...
Can we get more people to "hijack 'open'"? Can "'open' hijackers" become the new "rockstar developers?"
E.g. in retrospect, I wish I never bought into the Google ecosystem as much as I did, convenient though as it was. There are parts of it that I dislike or outright hate now, but the inconvenience of switching away is greater (yes, I've tried), so now I mostly just grumble quietly.
Then I spent about a decade and a half trying to embrace alternatives and I concluded that software that handles general use cases is actually a hard, specialized-skillset problem, and there's a lot of benefit to the full-stack control (and large developer culture, and multi-decade legacy history of successful product) that a long-legacy monoculture provides. Most of the friction is in wanting to use something that isn't in your monoculture, and trying to solve that by building a more general solution really just adds another monoculture to be incompatible with your favorite one (see https://xkcd.com/927/). Virtualization has basically solved that rare problem in my use-case.
To each their own, of course; I got bored with the game of making the computer architecture work over paying someone else to do that and then using the computer to make things.
Sucks though, Firefox probably could have make a longer exception for them if it mattered to them.