I agree that it's a hit piece, actually not as bad as I had expected based on the title. I disagree that it's fakenews, because the only disputable statements are the conclusions / interpretations / shade-throwing of the author, e.g. Scott's girlfriend.

But going meta -- not surprised by anything about the article except the timing, for which Scott offers an explanation in his counter-blog.

The #Resistance has not had much luck in attacking Trump directly, so they go after his allies and those upon whom Trump might have to lean for support.

Such a strategy may look cheap, but if one were tasked with stopping tanks without anti-tank weapons, then attacking fuel sources and making roads harder to navigate aren't such bad ideas.