Hacker News Reader

Comment by MBCook | Hacker News Reader

That's a lot more excusable when your car is priced at 35k than 75k.

Both BMW and Mercedes have models comparable to the Model 3 financially. I'm sure a 2-series or 3-series BMW, or CLA or C Class Mercedes far surpasses Tesla's build quality.

they cost the same, but are they electric? otherwise, it is not apples to apples.

Of course they are. I don't care if the car I drive is electric, gasoline, diesel, biofuel, or hydrogen fuel cells. The majority of vehicle purchasers are the same. If you're in the market for a high end electric vehicle, your choices are a Tesla, an i8, and I think that's about it.

To be fair, in this case it is apples to apples. The average car consumer does not weigh in the electric component with so much weight to overlook poor interior quality. Tesla's cars must be on the same level if they are to win the public's heart.

Why does it matter? The customer of this segment doesn't really care about the engine.

The complaints are levied against the $65k Model S, not the $35k Model 3. No one has really seen the interior of a production Model 3.

Even then I wouldn't believe it. I'll accept a subpar interior on a $25k Toyota. I won't on a $40k when there is competition that knows what they're doing (Acura, BMW, Cadillac, etc).

I know, which is why I pointed out the price of the Model 3.

I agree with you thought. My Accord is very nice. I have a feeling it's nicer than the fit & finish on the Model 3 will be.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com