The real problem with the panama papers incident is that it's not clear whether people on that list have done wrong or anything interesting.

Clearly, it was a way to hide away ill gotten cash for some people but it also has legitimate usage. I disagree the way it attempts to paint anyone who's name shows up in the panama papers as a criminal.

Lastly, I want to pay for journalism that weaves together a highly interesting and entertaining story. I think part of the talent is not just telling the facts but weaving a good story that invokes emotional response.

Panama papers did not meet those criteria so it's not as interesting as that paul le roux story.