Anyone worried about that statement. Ok so they are rare, but what happens when they do occur? File corruption is rare as well but in our large deployment over thousands of servers I see it happen pretty often.
Anyone worried about that statement. Ok so they are rare, but what happens when they do occur? File corruption is rare as well but in our large deployment over thousands of servers I see it happen pretty often.
But in general, Google's network is very different than other networks. With their resources they can provide guarantees and capacities other run-of-the-mill data centers can't. So others probably shouldn't listen and assume it applies to them as well.
Reliable enough, at least, that trading off perfect resiliency in the face of partitions is worth it to gain strong consistency semantics.
IMO behavior in the face of partitions is a bit of a red herring. The latency tradeoffs required in a geo-replicated CP vs AP system is much more relevant.