Why? Fundamentally, why? The ability for the shareholders to check the person who is running the company was sound principle I thought.
I'd also like an answer. My theory is that these founders are "just like us!" as opposed to the grey-haired CEOs running stodgy companies.
We plead for transparency and accountability of executives...for all companies outside the Valley.
Want to fix the desirability of hacking the bare possession of a company to avoid suits¹ taking over? Fix the governance of suits.
1 - Not the best possible term, but it is the best short term to use here. I'm not going into a lengthy debate on the meaning of "suits".