For example, how many people these days actuall just run with one monitor and do just one thing at a time? I certainly don't, and for example, on my i7 laptop, if I have firefox up on the second monitor and play cs-go, I get 20fps less. That never happened on my AMD FX system...
In essence what I am saying is parallel workloads are becoming the norm, and thats why I'm betting on AMD in the long run.
The world where everything is single-threaded is quickly shrinking, and the world where people only do one thing is as well. For example, lots of game engines traditionally had this problem, but they are getting better and better and multi-threading for perf gains.
6 cores and 12 threads vs my current i5-3570K starts to look interesting, very interesting.
They went from a 50-60% advantage to 5-6% advantage for kabylake and near parity with Broadwell (current high thread count Xeons and Extreme consumer platforms).
Super stable and very good performance for relatively little money. Web stuff is one of those places where multi-threading and lots of cores is an easy win due to the nature of the workload.
[0] https://twitter.com/CPCHardware/status/844618089618722816
[1] https://videocardz.com/67649/amd-ryzen-cpu-with-12-cores-and...
And actually, the difference is less performance-per-clock now, but more that higher Intel cpus, the 7600K and 7700K, have a higher clock to start with.
Who exactly do you think visits these forums? One-tab open in the browser grandmas?
I imagine most people here can make full use of at least 4-cores/8 threads, at all times, between compiling, rendering, editing, video streaming, joggling between 50 browser tabs and other programs, opening one or two VMs for testing, running local web servers, and so on.