Which one should we sue? Slippery slope. In the end no one was forced anyone not to vaccinate the kids.
If vaccines are made mandatory then the state can fine/jail the parents and do them even if the parents chose not to
My point still stands. If it was so ironclad, it would illegal to refuse to vaccinate. Refuse to "care" about your child and you go to jail and lose the child Yet, you can refuse to vaccinate him/her and suffer no consequences. So you have a choice. If I tell you that you do not have to vaccinate, why should I be sued or jailed?
Let's start fresh:
1. Vaccines apparently are not mandatory. You can vaccinate your child or not.
2. Someone that's telling parents not to vaccinate, shouldn't be going to jail, because he's not doing anything illegal (see point 1).
3. The state should make vaccines mandatory first, which IMO is the correct choice.
There's no FUD or anti-vaccine thing, simply saying that as long as vaccines are optional, people should not go to jail for saying don't vaccinate.