You're dismissing her comments out-of-hand as not entirely honest and assuming you know her true feelings.
Maybe now that she's been given the opportunity to speak, we should listen to and consider her thoughts.
You're dismissing her comments out-of-hand as not entirely honest and assuming you know her true feelings.
Maybe now that she's been given the opportunity to speak, we should listen to and consider her thoughts.
*does HN indicate when a comment has been edited?
s/world-wise/world-wide/
_________________________
And that's correct. I put no state-of-mind or otherwise speak for her. I'm acknowledging the complexity of highlighting a potential problem amongst your peers in a very public manner. Especially in Academia, where your peers approve, collaborate, and act as a peer, attacking them publicly could have disastrous consequences.
It is "safer", and provides face to be accepting of such actions, be they intentional or unintentional.
(Yes, I work in Academia. This sort of thing happens pretty regularly, from what Ive seen. What's that saying... The nail that sticks out gets the hammer?)