Comment by andreiw | Hacker News Reader

Comment by andreiw | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Of course, it will stay locked for a few. Is the IBM/COBOL crowd representative of today's compute resources? Not really. The same could be said about OS/2-powered ATMs and point of sale terminals. The fact of their continued existence doesn't prove the OS/2 is a widely deployed and growing technology.

But overall, the world has changed quite a bit. We're suddenly not in a world ruled entirely by DB2, MSSQL and Oracle, running on AIX, Windows and Solaris. The software stack has opened up, and is no longer bound to any specific platform. The few big software names don't get to decide what kit to run them all...we're approaching a world where ISA won't matter. You'll buy hardware because it fits your performance and TCO targets, not because you're locked in.

What sucks for Intel is that they've failed to identify mobile devices as the "next PC", in the sense of the disruptive potential...the PC killed boutique workstations and servers and it killed them from the bottom. Along with IoT, that's two huge opportunities missed. Itanium was a pincer attempt, but no one targets the top and succeeds... you have to start at the bottom (this is btw why Power needs to scale and price down if it hopes to grow beyond its niche).

" Is the IBM/COBOL crowd representative of today's compute resources? Not really. "

They might be in terms of getting locked-in to a proprietary vendor using proprietary language, extensions, libraries, and/or OS's that are hard to impossible to get off of. That's exactly what Wintel has been doing with enterprise software. Microsoft is still pulling in billions despite people saying other stuff would kill them for some time now. It's a combination of their market hold, lock-in, and patent suits. They're pulling $1+ billion from Android with patents despite not contributing jack to it. Oracle and SAP are still bringing in billions due to market hold and lock-in. This is a steady thing.

"What sucks for Intel is that they've failed to identify mobile devices as the "next PC", in the sense of the disruptive potential...the PC killed boutique workstations and servers and it killed them from the bottom."

That's true. That it didn't need compatibility with Intel is exactly how it killed the need for their ISA in those sectors.

"you have to start at the bottom (this is btw why Power needs to scale and price down if it hopes to grow beyond its niche)."

I agree. Great as it is, it's way too expensive. The POWER/PPC model was doing a lot better with Apple on it selling them at reasonable price. The ecosystem was better anyway with all kinds of software made for it. It had a better ROI for buyers. They need to do that again for POWER(number here) even scaling down the capabilities as the price goes down if necessary. I'd say their accelerator interconnect that can bring in stuff like FPGA's would be a winning differentiator but Intel outsmarted IBM again with the Altera acquisition. I'm expecting great things in offloading out of that if they haven't shown up already.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com