>Hitler was a full-throated socialist too.
Is there even remotely a consensus by historians on this?
Is there even remotely a consensus by historians on this?
Socialists supported him because of his full-throated support of socialism.
That he killed some of them when they became inconvenient is perfectly characteristic of socialists, who frequently purge their own ranks quite brutally.
What you say is funny because it was the capitalistic right that led him to absolute power (see: hindenburg, and the pressure of the rich to get hitler named chancellor because they feared the communists).
And the last statement is scraping the bottom of the barrel too so I won't comment more on that.