It's interesting to see algorithms catching up to being able to replicate this. However when you mention these kind of abilities to photographers, they get defensive, almost like you are threatening their identity by saying a computer can do it.
It's a fairly common reaction from most people. Hayao Miyazaki, director of Spirited Away, got very upset after being shown a demo of AI doing animation:
https://qz.com/859454/the-director-of-spirited-away-says-ani...
His reaction of disgust isn't to the general idea of computer-generated animation, but to the specific animation he's being shown, which features a corpse thrashing around on the ground, and specifically in relation to having a severely disabled friend.
It's entirely possible he's not a fan of computer-generated animation in general, but that clip doesn't indicate much one way or another.
Subjectively speaking, the world always seems more saturated through my eyes. Objectively speaking, the eye has something like 20 stops of dynamic range while paper has 9 at best...
On the other hand, imaged thoughtfully and without enhancement, the mundane can be truly beautiful.