> According to the OSI, the only authority on what constitutes open source
On what basis is there any authority? Just discriminate against a FoE, and call it OS anyway - are they going to sue?
On what basis is there any authority? Just discriminate against a FoE, and call it OS anyway - are they going to sue?
No, but projects insisting on OS won't use it, and every online discussion about it will derail into a discussion about calling things "Open Source" that don't fit the OSI criteria and the pro and cons of creating your own licenses ;)
Since OP explicitly mentioned "open sourcing" it I think it's a fair concern to point out.