Hacker News Reader

Funny thing with exponential curves, no matter where on the curve you are, everyone behind you seems mind-numbingly slow and everyone ahead seems mind-bogglingly fast.

View on HN

This always confused me - people talk about an exponential explosion, but the rate of change of e^x is e^x, so there is no actual 'knee' in the curve with a huge speedup afterwards...

or, if you prefer, every point is a 'knee' in the curve with a huge speedup afterward

Except in reality, when samples are infrequent and there is significant 'noise' in the data, it can be far from clear what shape the graph is. This is usually particularly true in the early stages of the development of a trend. How do you know you're in the early stages? You don't, but it's a big mistake to think that trends which eventually turn out to be exponential must therefore be obviously so at all times.

You're betraying an extremely. And I mean extraordinarily, laughably modernistic world view. We were making accheulian hand axes for well over one million years. Plus. Technological development during that period really didn't look very exponential. How do you measure change when literally nothing new is developed for tens of thousands of generations?

If you only look at development since agriculture then yes, but that's less than one percentof the time since the taming of fire.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com