The Japanese government was preparing for the surrender for a year before Hiroshima. They were also talking with the Soviet Union for peace negotiations months before. It was matter of time for surrender and just the condition which was not decided. Japanese government has not enslaved like what the US did to Africa.
>Before the nukes, US Bombings were already killing hundreds of thousands of japanese civilians a month. Tens of thousands of Japanese soldiers were dying in combat, and in suicide attacks. Thousands of americans were dying as well. Every day of delay cost thousands of lives, mostly japanese. You seem to care about them, why do you advocate for longer war to kill more of them?
As I said, there were alternative ways without killing that much and using atomic bombs in the city twice. It is just that the US took the easy path.
> War is hell.
Yes, very true.
> The US didn't rape Nanking
The large number claimed by the current Chinese government of which country that does internet censorship and anti-Japan campaign is a propaganda which is officially denied by the Japanese government and historians.
> It didn't bomb Pearl Harbor.
Pearl Harbor was definitely bad. But mostly killed were combatants that is different from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
> It didn't torture and murder millions of surrendered civilians and POWs.
Wow millions? Where did this large number come from?
> The Japanese entered in a war where their only way out was unconditional surrender, and the Emperor and the military junta that ruled Japan refused to even consider that option until after the 2nd japanese city was destroyed by a nuclear bomb. The firebombing of tokyo wasn't even close to enough to get them to quit.
They were trying to have a better condition for surrender. Surrender was a matter of time and the US didn't have to drop the atomic bombs twice in the city.