This reads like an undergrad has just binged on Adam Curtis and thinks they've reached some meaningful conclusions.
I'm not saying much is wrong, just that it's neither new or insightful
I'm not saying much is wrong, just that it's neither new or insightful
And you're probably being downvoted because your criticism is neither specific nor substantiated, and fairly snide besides.
But I liked the article overall and think it's a good starting point for discussion.