[0] https://trustedidpremier.com/eligibility/eligibility.html
[0] https://trustedidpremier.com/eligibility/eligibility.html
Why they didn't go with a subdomain of Equifax.com is beyond me.
Phishers are going to have a field day with this, though.
Now, I wonder if it's best to DIY on the credit freeze thing. The only thing is that it appears that a freeze needs to be redone every few months.
FTC: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0497-credit-freeze-faq...
Experian: https://www.experian.com/freeze/center.html
TransUnion: https://freeze.transunion.com/sf/securityFreeze/landingPage....
I clicked on the "Enroll" button before reading this (after giving my last name and six-digit social), and it told me to come back in a week to enroll. Now I'm wondering, did I just give up my rights?
> As used in this arbitration provision, the term "Claim" or "Claims" means any claim, dispute, or controversy between You and Us relating in any way to Your relationship with Equifax, including but not limited to any Claim arising from or relating to this Agreement, the Products or this Site, or any information You receive from Us, whether based on contract, statute, common law, regulation, ordinance, tort, or any other legal or equitable theory, regardless of what remedy is sought. This arbitration obligation extends to claims You may assert against Equifax’s parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, assigns, employees, and agents. The term "Claim" shall have the broadest possible construction, except that it does not include any claim, dispute or controversy in which You contend that EIS violated the FCRA. Any claim, dispute, or controversy in which You contend that EIS violated the FCRA is not subject to this provision and shall not be resolved by arbitration.
Note the retroactive nature of the terms. Open question: does this indemnify the parent company? (A CNN story says it may not, but is not definite: money.cnn.com/2017/09/08/technology/equifax-monitoring-services/index.html)
I mean, let's think this through. You're not the only one that can read a contract and figure out this "scam". You think a NYT reporter can't do the same? And are you assuming Equifax thinks no one will figure it out? Because catching them pulling a stunt like that would probably make the front page.
Regardless, I may not be a lawyer, but the agreement doesn't say that.
For my spouse, your link answered that they weren't affected.