"Attorney Scott Nelson, from the advocacy organization Public Citizen, says he isn’t convinced a chatbot can successfully win a lawsuit."
Gee, I bet there isn't a conflict of interest in that statement.
Gee, I bet there isn't a conflict of interest in that statement.
That's not at all a value judgement about Public Citizen or their statement. Just pointing out the potential conflict.
The last thing anybody wants is for their profession to be automated away, so the conflict of interest is justified, but worth noting.
Also worth noting that you can still get paid if you work for a nonprofit.
Regardless, I think we could use a bit more automation in the legal field given how disproportionately distributed representation seems to be from my perspective as a relatively poor person.
On that, we're agreed. I was raised with no conception that there were legal options; attorneys were just too far outside the realm of affordability to be a thing my parents would have considered under any but the direst circumstances. I have the same mindset, even when it's been detrimental to my own economic situation.