My opinion is that this sort of comment is unhelpful. Even Buzzfeed does some quality honest to God journalism once in a while. I feel like a comment like this should perhaps only happen if you can find something inherently wrong with the article in question, not just displeasure for a source site in general.

Daily Mail may not be the Wall Street Journal, but in many cases I have found it serviceable, and in HN's case it is often just necessary for it to catalyze discussion on the topic.

Perhaps go and find a better source for us, link it, and flag it for a mod to consider swapping the article in the parent.

Here is a more reliable source http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/autos/gm-china-electric-car/...

Wait that article is from more than a month ago, and so is the daily mail article. Why is this being posted now?