Fits in pretty well with the ongoing Rust agenda here in HN
Never have I ever had a compiler tell me to "consider" changing some type declaration, because maybe, just maybe I was probably intending to do what it suggests all along.
Also generally things you didn't write still compile and run. This is not a given in e.g. C/C++.
I can't confirm that. I have already ran into compiler bugs and very very unhelpful error messages and I haven't really done that much in the language.
There was another one, but I can't find the issue for it. I asked in IRC about it and it was fixed by adding &* before an expression. I didn't understand why ...
What you have is a reference to a type with a Deref-coercion to the type you want, but the compiler won't coerce under the reference for you, so you have to dereference and then reference it again, and then type inference can work out that you wanted to reference the coerced type.
You probably have an argument that they are doing something different and right, but how markedly different is it really?
I can't help but notice that the same communities that have the reputation for being prickly are the ones that have the largest influx of people who come stomping in to the community, and one way or another try to turn the conversation to why everything the community is doing is wrong and stupid and how everything the community is doing needs to immediately be rewritten in accordance with their unambiguously correct opinions, even though they just joined the multi-year party ten minutes ago.
No, I do not have some particular community in mind that I'm coyly not specifying when I say that; it is a pattern I've observed across quite a few communities.