>This is you ignoring the first definition.

No, it's English allowing words to have multiple definitions.

>I do understand how language works. You can choose to focus on one definition and ignore another, as is clear by this thread.

So why do you take issue with that? If one definition applies, and the other does not, why are you focusing on the definition that doesn't apply? That would be like me picking apart every single word of your post because they can all have multiple meanings. You're straw manning a headline that isn't even making an argument. You're just being disingenuous to be a dick.