Works beautifully with w3m which has become my main site test lately. Another great example is HN itself.
If it doesn't work well with w3m something is wrong with the site philosophy or execution.
If it doesn't work well with w3m something is wrong with the site philosophy or execution.
Point of clarification: "wrong" according to your moral philosophy about web sites, even if it's one I happen to share.
Philosophically wrong is using technology that limits the web from being what the interpreter expected, as in this example (there's still a rational reason in this case to do it the "wrong" way and it's based on personal morality).
Objectively wrong being trying to make a website out of custard.