I think this is all OP was asking about. They want to know if you've ever removed a tooth before, not if you've ever removed the right molar from a 27 year old very tall man who has a small jaw and bad breath.
My opthalmologist used to do LASIK as part of her regular practice, before deciding it was better to refer patients to somebody who was doing the same type of operation over and over - probably getting five times as much practice or more.
Indeed what is failed, and how is the procedure responsible for it and not care observance (ie orthopedic or even cardiac procedures that should be associated with a loss of weight/exercise or whatever, who's at fault if patient does not follow his diet ? Is it a failed procedure because of the pratician or because of the patient ?), or even simple patient physiology.
This question also makes me super angry because it really makes no sense whatsoever, and just comes from unreasonably suspicious patients who should probably just give up on using modern medicine if they can't trust a whole TEAM of doctors and caregivers.
Procedures themselves are not even the riskiest thing compared to anesthesia or even post op care (hello nosocomial infections). Also most procedures are not rocket science either, in my experience surgery is more like a makeshift job than anything.
Personal example : a decade ago using ultrasound to remove thyroid nodules was at the clinical trial stage with good results. But surgeons were still in the mindset of "remove everything even if you could keep half your thyroid, and enjoy your levotirox". Now ultrasound are a go: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434558/ so if you bet on progress you won.
I did ask my surgeon and he answered. But he is pretty exceptional in a number of ways.