Well, sure, and a billionaire can donate billions of dollars to help defend you. Or you could crowd-fund $5 million. Or...
But designing a justice system around "maybe you'll find a charitable person willing to help" seems like a bad idea.
But designing a justice system around "maybe you'll find a charitable person willing to help" seems like a bad idea.
Pointing out problems with the current system is not a logical fallacy, and having a working solution in-hand is not a pre-requisite to observing the existence of problems.
Also, accusing me of using the Nirvana fallacy while also accusing me of not providing an alternative policy is literally a contradiction...