The IPR lawyers hate this and want to say "no no no you can't vest rights in those MP3s with your son" but they're going to struggle to show a loss of continuity in the licenced holder.
Personal domain be powerful tool.
The IPR lawyers hate this and want to say "no no no you can't vest rights in those MP3s with your son" but they're going to struggle to show a loss of continuity in the licenced holder.
Personal domain be powerful tool.
I didn't mean to imply what I do is intruding a legal mechanism to acquire IPR by transfer. The law says I bought exclusive use, for me and regards the MP3 licence to use as a thing which dies with me. The email chain is going to say "yep.. this mailbox responds when you ask for money" and so the issuing MP3 licence issuer is going to say "I see no interruption in service to the identity I apparently sold the IPR to" so whilst in law, I'm still breaking the law, in practice, I don't think people are going to know. Then, when the new owner subscribes to an 'all you can eat' MP3 service which scrapes the id3 info and says "your tunes are in me" the music will be re-identified, and I suspect their permanency will be enshrined through that agency, even if they terminate the rental agreement: most of the ones I used let you use a one-time bulk downloader to get back the tunes you uplifted by signature.
Its not me@lhs.com. its a generic like sharedmusic@lhs.com or music@lhs.com or family@lhs.com btw.
(and I wish it was lhs.com)