> Make a league for people who want to use roids, and for the ones who don't. It'll multiply your revenue 2x, organisers.

Then you'll have teams pressuring competitors to take more and more drugs, it will become a doping arms race that will end up with serious health risks and deaths.

There are already cases in the late 80's, early 90's of cyclists dying in their sleep because their haematocrit levels were so high their blood because too viscous to pump when their heart rate dropped too low.

That and your use of the word "roids" and "bikers" makes me think you're not well read up on the subject.

Strawman and inaccurate to boot.

Hint: doping in cycling doesn't refer to steroids.

I didn't downvote (I don't do that because it creates echo chambers), but there is more to it than what you wrote. The article linked gives you some clues but essentially Armstrong was the guy driving the doping. Many other guys followed his lead so that they could compete and that was certainly the wrong thing to do but many of us do similar things in our workplaces.