Regardless of the subject, this article is superbly written and a great example of how to cover psychology articles as a reporter.

Instead of simply stating the most headling grabbing implication of the research and leaving it at that, it went in depth to show the "what if" questions researchers controlled for rather than leaving us to guess or hunt down a copy of the real research paper (the reader is lazy, were not going to do it). Hopefully we get more submissions likes this when it comes to psychology articles and less 'scientist found X, the end'