> The most fundamental issue is that history has shown time and again that the corruption of the powers that be is not a question of if but a question of when.
History has also shown it goes the other way as well.
> The most fundamental issue is that history has shown time and again that the corruption of the powers that be is not a question of if but a question of when.
History has also shown it goes the other way as well.
Would you still say everything's fine and we shouldn't make them less efficient because we're worried about hypotheticals?
Most people are naturally not particularly well informed on most things. Expecting them to collectively vote on the people most likely to lead them in all things is bound to result in bad results more than occasionally. Even moreso when we're so easily manipulated by tribalism, charisma, and so on. A successful politician and a successful conman share mostly the same skill set! And restricting voting to some group deemed sufficiently informed is an even worse solution as you'd end up with something like gerrymandering ramped up exponentially.
Elaborate on "history has shown it goes the other way as well"?