Why is a submission with an accurately worded title linking to a paper from top-ranking institutions contributed by 18 authors flagged on HN?
Threads are acutely sensitive to initial conditions. What you did made a very large increase in the probability that this discussion would be ruined before it began.
HN is divided on divisive issues. Anthropomorphizing it into something that "likes" what you dislike and "dislikes" what you like is just an illusion, but has become a rhetorical trick, as cheap as it is common. Please don't do that here.