If there is a rabid dog in the street where you resided, it's not a big problem. But if there are 10 rabid dogs there, the severity of the issue is much higher.
But this article isn't about the evil class of billionaires and who belongs to that class is it? So, it's whataboutism: 'what about mark zuckerberg?'.
Only if we restrict our thinking into how the article frames the world. Which is a sad way of going about reading things...
I'm just agreeing that it's blatent whataboutism and kind of off topic to bring up something unrelated. I actually do think Mark is likely more dangerous.
> The very essence of "whataboutism" is to deflect criticism by directing it at an unrelated party.