Maybe religious people aren't the one-dimensional voters that you imagined them to be. But if you were to admit that, how would you slam both Trump and non-atheists in the same post?
Your point would be valid if religion was a low priority hobby.
It isn't, so (a subset of) [religious voting block] are just religious when it suits them, ie hypocrites.
If you could get over your contempt for people who see things differently than you do and actually talk with some of them you might find that a lot of people were voting against Hillary instead of for Trump.
> ''The problem is,'' he said, ''there are a few hundred women every year who have personally agonizing situations where their children are born or are about to be born with terrible deformities, which will cause them to die either just before, during or just after childbirth. And these women, among other things, cannot preserve the ability to have further children unless the enormity -- the enormous size of the baby's head is reduced before being extracted from their bodies.
> ''You know, Hillary and I, we only had one child. And I just cannot look at a woman who's in a situation where the baby she is bearing, against all her wishes and prayers, is going to die anyway, and tell her that I'm signing a law which will prevent her from ever having another child.''
Clearly a monster of pure evil. And his wife too.
Whereas her opponent supported torture, dehumanized immigrants every chance he got, has 5 children with 3 different women, bragged about cheating and sexual assault, lied as easy as breathing. Admittedly after the election, but supported a pedophile, although he joked about dating his daughter years before.
I fully stand by exactly what I originally posted. As a raised pentecostal Christian, if that should matter at all.