I find the excessive use of "colossal" and "rupture" to be very suggestive of a Freudian slip implying the author is subconsciously aware that his inspiration followed a massive cerebral hemorrhage.
I'm not sure why you are promoting it if you can't explain it yourself.
Here, for comparison, is what appears to me to be a normal scientific paper that mentions spinors:
Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model F Gliozzi, J Scherk, D Olive - Nuclear Physics B, 1977
http://cds.cern.ch/record/203097/files/CM-P00061869.pdf
Note that it does not end with "THE END" and it does cite other scientific works.