It’s a common, and I believe very fair criticism of the title “Software Engineer” that there is nowhere near the rigor and requirements that “real” engineers (structural engineers, mechanical engineers) must deal with. There’s no licensing. No proof you know what you’re doing. And sure, that’s probably because mostly software isn’t responsible for life or death situations like bridges and buildings are constantly.

But honestly, the term “Software Engineer” is a farce at best.

So maybe the author is in the camp that worries too much about meaningless titles.