[0] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cryptokitties#sectio...
[0] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cryptokitties#sectio...
2. Nobody invested in Crptokitties. They invested in a gaming/collectibles company; from TechCrunch: “While the startup is being pretty mum on what the future looks like and what they’re planning on using this funding for, it’s almost certain that the long term goal is to expand beyond CryptoKitties and use the same Ethereum ERC-721 collectible standard to create other game experiences, especially ones that can be played by regular people who are unfamiliar with cryptocurrency.”
You use flappy bird and pokemeon go as examples of fads that would be dumb to invest in, but what about the early investors in Zygna? Gaming and collectibles doesn’t appeal to me personally, but they are massive markets and growing. Early stage investing is a long shot, and odds are this company fails. But the execution to date and market opportunity are sufficiently appealing that I’d invest alongside USV in these guys if I could.
Someone who bought cryptokitty early on sold it for 100x returns easily.
Everyone on the hype train was reselling kitties to next bigger fool.
Now try to get 12Mi outside of SF and Bay Area for something with a more solid business plan, see how it goes.
I had a lot of respect for AH and USV. In particular I know some of the folks at USV. But some of their decisions astound me. When they invested in Crypto Kitties and Fred posted about it, I felt they jumped the shark.
I remember how $31M was poured into a startup called Color a few years back, only for the startup to go belly up a month later. Meanwhile they don’t even take a meeting with something far more promising, sometimes. I feel I will never understand the VC mindset.
For what it’s worth, here are their perfunctory rationales:
https://versionone.vc/announcing-our-investment-in-cryptokit...
I think that might because you're looking at it like this:
"How will a game that lets you breed collectible cats be something that people wanna do for a long time?"
When instead you should be looking at it like..
"Can provably scarce digital assets that are actually owned by users (not rented like the current system) be useful in the gaming world?"
CryptoKitties as a game is likely just a fad. But the investors are betting the latter idea might be a game changer when executed correctly (ie. building a fun game that has longterm user retention)
2. CryptoKitties went viral, slowing ETH transactions to a crawl and making top headlines - what if that can be repeated?
3. as someone said, 12M is nothing for them