This person obviously just want something to be angry at, which is typical for free software advocates. Instead of complaining that other people do not adhere to what you believe, go create it yourself. You do not own the word and if you're so for freedom, why are you so against others not making the same priorities?
It makes so little sense to me.
Now that they are toying with open source, it's been fun seeing how little power Microsoft has to deal with public outcries on open platforms like GitHub. Alas, we will see if it stays that way now that they have bought the damn platform. Still, it is our responsibility to steer Microsoft in the right direction, and not tolerate anything even slightly bad if we have the power to complain about it now that they care about developer PR (to the tune of $5 billion).
I'm curious what "dealing with it" would entail. From Microsoft's perspective, I might imagine that there doesn't seem to be anything to deal with. There certainly was a notable internet-wide spit take when the news broke. But it's all but died out, and I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a measurable effect on numbers.
How does one distinguish that from revenge?