The poster is literally talking about my language, but implying something about me, which is ad-hominem. What they should do is say why I am wrong if they believe Im wrong. If they dont say why I'm wrong because the scope of it is beyond their ability to convey in a HN comment, then fair enough. But they're essentially hand-waving away me and what I'm saying because they've declared it racist (and indirectly me).

Actually everyone is racist so the term is redundant. La Raza (now renamed for PR reasons) is not protesting admissions discrimination against Asian applicants in academia for example. They exclusively advocate for the rights of their own ethnic group, the only reason they advocate for other groups is where such advocacy also directly benefits themselves.

You're quite disingenuous, I made a comment that slavery is expensive and slaves have to be fed and housed so slavery is not very useful, and actually more expensive that just having "free" people.

The reason you choose to cherry pick something to say about "oppression of white males" (which I would never use a phrase like that) is you know the negative sentiment that surrounds that phrase here on HN, so that's why you use it and attach it to me.