True. And the constantly varying price of land in response to the desirability of the location means that land has this inexorable tendency to push down real wages regardless of almost any kind of technological, social, or political artifices meant to raise wages.

Having a car, when it was uncommon, made it possible to engage in a bit of "geo-arbitrage" but as soon as that became common, the ability to commute was fully factored into a location.

When having a dual income household was uncommon, that could get you ahead. When that became common, it was factored into land prices, and having a dual income became necessary just to not fall behind.

All technological and social improvements follow this same pattern, and it is why the naive futurist conception of a world without work is never going to happen as long as our land system remains unchanged. That is precisely the paradox of Progress and Poverty that Henry George was explaining.