Everything else they might do - collating papers into a physical journal, complaining about bibliography formats, etc. is superfluous nonsense that nobody really cares about.
Look at arxiv - the only thing it's missing that journals have is reviews.
Everything else they might do - collating papers into a physical journal, complaining about bibliography formats, etc. is superfluous nonsense that nobody really cares about.
Look at arxiv - the only thing it's missing that journals have is reviews.
Yelp -- How are their costs significant? Web hosting is extremely cheap.
Twitter -- How are their costs significant? Web hosting is extremely cheap.
Is the value of journals over arxiv worth the price? (market says yes, but markets are sometimes wrong).
Or SciHub's, for that matter.
https://arxiv.org/help/support/faq#2B
https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/arxivpub/arXiv+Budget...
But this is one of the biggest sites in the world. Something closer to what Journal Publisher's would need is Arxiv.
Arxiv's budget is $1m of which they spend $60k on hosting and basically all of the rest on staff and staff support.
Eslevier's revenue is £2.5b. billion. Their profit margin is over 50%. What a monumental waste.
That is a pretty significant difference.