they should be neutral. I find it funny how people go up in arms about net neutrality but do a 180 about the information platform providers in the level above ISPs.
Here's the difference: Alex Jones can go create his own video site easily, but he can't create his own worldwide ISP.
And if he used an existing infrastructure like AWS, I would hope AWS would kick him off of it.
People have to take action and opt in to watching something on YouTube. They have a choice. If people don't want to hear someone they never have to.
Youtube doesn't provide the means for publishers to interrupt what you are currently watching (well there's ads but that's a bit different as ads have increase scrutiny).
If they would manage their brand as well as Apple, people would probably praise the end of net neutrality.