Did you read the article?
> The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"
And isn't this just a strawman? Are people proposing indoor vaping laws?
> The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"
And isn't this just a strawman? Are people proposing indoor vaping laws?