> no skin in the game
The presumption that people who spend 40+ hours a week of their lives there, and are dependent on the company for their income and healthcare have "no skin in the game" is odd.
The presumption that people who spend 40+ hours a week of their lives there, and are dependent on the company for their income and healthcare have "no skin in the game" is odd.
Nobody talks about employee control. It's about employee participation! And employees are a stakeholder in the success of the company. They contribute to it, they benefit or suffer from it. Employees had a part in building the company.
Anecdotes cancel out. Do you have a point, or a strawman?