Hacker News Reader

Comment by userbinator | Hacker News Reader

That's called C.

Strictly speaking, C++ is not anymore a superset of C. Mostly syntatic sugar but still, some C code can not be parsed by C++. But yeah, i know what you mean, i guess this is a bastard of C and C++?

C++ was never a superset of C. The same keywords mean different things, character literals are different types, void pointer assignment works differently, etc.

No, this isn't C either. The following doesn't work:

  struct Bob {
    int a;
  };
  int main() {
    int a;
    struct Bob x;
    x.a = 3;
    return 0;
  }

So when they say "without object oriented features" they seem to mean: "No extendable type system". Which does make this a lot simpler of a language.

C is C++ minus object-oriented features, increased type-safety, template meta-programming, lambdas, and many more features.

Not true, C has features missing from C++.

So, are there situations where one would use C over C++? I don't know C++, and only learned C while catching up on my fundamentals.

Which?

https://www.quora.com/What-features-are-present-in-C-but-not...

There is a more complete answer with a link but quickly : restrict, designated initializers, generic macros...

Right, the useless cruft that makes your program impossible to read, let alone reason about

Is this the cruft that gets reinvented in C whenever the project grows complex enough?

Something like: any sufficiently complicated C program contains an ad-hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of C++'s features.

Ha! The lambdas and tools surrounding them in C++11 and later have vastly improved the ability to make programs much easier to read and reason about.

Hardly. Compare std sort to qsort and tell me that it's superior.

yes, I guess all those C++ programs don't exist and C++ programmers don't actually read or write any programs.

It could still support e.g. function templates (not sure if it actually does).

I didn't write the README.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com