Hacker News Reader

Comment by anoncoward111 | Hacker News Reader

Why don't you try privately funding a platform where you can tolerate all the types of speech that you wish to tolerate?

Innovation is hard innit?

View on HN

It's not even hard. Gab and Voat exist. No innovation is needed to set up a social site. You can run a sizable one for less than a few hundred a month given how cheap cloud hosting has become.

Interesting. The main problem being Twitter's entrenched/sticky network effect?

Just a couple hundred donators could support the whole project with a few bucks, a la Dwarf Fortress or many hundreds of Youtubers

I don't think there's any real problem here: conservatives in washington wants their base to think there's a conspiracy against them in tech.

The technology industry employs large numbers of people who are college-educated, millennials/yougner Gen-Xers and/or Asian-Americans: people who demographically skew left. This alone makes our industry suspect to the conservatives.

Isn't it odd that Steve Bannon starts publicly ranting about there being too many Asians in Silicon Valley and now all of a sudden we're far too liberal and censoring conservative voices... despite the fact that both Facebook and Twitter have been utilized deftly by conservatives to spread their message and communicate with their voters?

It's called "working the refs": https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22work...

Are you kidding me? I do not know who refs, but if Social Media companies are your refs, god bless your children.. then need lot of luck!

Here is an interesting exercise - name 5 silicon valley conservative stalwarts.

> Here is an interesting exercise - name 5 silicon valley conservative stalwarts.

Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Palmer Luckey, Tom Perkins, David Sacks.... and for extra credit: Jeremy Tunnel, Curtis Yarvin, Brendan Eich, Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina, Ted Dzuiba...

The federal government should actually open a public forum for people to just talk. It would be interesting and cheap as experiments go.

There are no true public forums anywhere on the web that I'm aware of.

If you're not already aware, I'd recommend checking out deliberative democracy. Some of its advocates are pushing for something like this, but in a structured, moderated form. There's obviously debate over what the structure and moderation should look like and plenty of debate between deliberative democracy proponents and related schools of thought, but the general thrust (my words, I'm not speaking for anyone else, so I might not do them justice) is that the process of discussion and deliberation is as fundamental to democracy as the process of voting, and should be accommodated by the government just like voting is.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com