I've found in interviews that some people expect to do exactly what their credentials have prepared them for. At least for the places I've worked, that's insufficient for programming and other tech.
I've found in interviews that some people expect to do exactly what their credentials have prepared them for. At least for the places I've worked, that's insufficient for programming and other tech.
Hiring for a startup : "They seem like more of a big-company type"
Hiring for a big company: "They seem like more of a startup type"
It's not really company specific.
IME this is also how you have the most fun at work, provided that the "extra" tasks you take on aren't particularly unpleasant.
Basically, a situation when the areas are guarded (via seniority, permissions, available info), yet the performance or interest is no longer there. This way the responsibilities are fuzzy on purpose. "A team-player doesn't say No... - if not you, then who?!"
Ideally, a collaboraive team should not restrict the information flow, yet that's how the hierarchy works. The Boss knows, the minions infer.
"I like to work on a team with strictly defined roles."
"I like to know exactly what I'm working on from day to day."
"I prefer to have my worked planned out weeks/months/years in advance."
All three valid, but not necessarily great for a startup.
I'd prefer to work for the most enterprisey company that ever enterprised. I'm pretty happy at the B2B telecom where I work now, even.
(And, yes, I'm agreeing with you and providing a data point in your favor.)