Yes. The issues I'm raising are largely to do with some extremely large companies.
> Where should Amazon magically create this money from? It can only come at the expense of customers.
Are you saying that no company pays their employees enough? Or that employees in general shouldn't be paid a living wage? Or even that Amazon, a company headed by the actual richest person in the world, really makes zero profit and must absolutely hurt customers in order to make ends meet?
> That's a net positive. Less work, the same job done.
Less jobs is a positive* only if those without jobs have a living income. UBI is a proposed solution: it hasn't been introduced anywhere as far as I'm aware.
> Making more work is easy, just let people throw rocks from one pile to the other and back again.
And who pays these rock throwers? Do their wages come from the taxes Bezos doesn't pay?
* EDIT: To be clear, on the less jobs question, I am generally not in favour of having a less efficient system just to create jobs (it may sound that way above). I'm just a realist, acknowledging that we have a system that requires job-creation as a means to supply members of society with the means to sustain themselves. If we did not require job-creation to do that, I would completely agree that "less work, the same job done" would be a positive thing.