I don't think he's a shill, just over-committed. At one point the the founder of Oculus Palmer Luckey even called him out as an "insufferable fanboy". [1]
I don't say this just be a detractor or mean-spirited, but I would advise caution as there's likely bias in these charts.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/oculus/comments/4gfpjk/palmer_lucke...
They could have included a row for "Open platform for games", or "Has finger detection", etc. Alternatively, they could have included columns for Vive, or Vive+Wireless, and so on.
This kind of implicit bias is very difficult to avoid, however; in general, viewers of ANY online media should already be assuming the viewpoints they're consuming are biased in the first place.
In particular, since the source is the /r/oculus subreddit, anyone viewing this information there (1) already assumes this implicit bias, and (2) is likely to share it.
If you're familiar with P-Hacking, then you know how even "factual information" can be misrepresented.
Just when I thought I couldn't think less of Palmer Luckey...
1. No wires (easy to move around, can use anywhere)
2. No setup (no cameras to attach, drivers to install, etc)
3. 2 hands and positional tracking
I have a Vive, but having to setup all the components and deal with the wires is pretty annoying. I also have a daydream, but having to pop in my phone, drain my battery and install all that crap on my phone is also annoying. This is the perfect middle ground. Now I'm curious to see if Google announces something similar in a few weeks.