Company lied to consumer that this wouldn't happen. Then it happened. And you're blaming the consumer?
I didn't see anywhere in the article that says Google promised that, and from what I know of security that's impossible. The article did say Google offered a way of increased security, an answer the consumer neglected to use and says isn't enough. (edit - says with absolutely no knowledge on the subject that 2FA isn't enough)
In your opinion, what should Google have done differently here? And where did you see that Google promised no one would be able to log in if that person had the correct username and password and 2FA wasn't enabled?