The phrase strikes me as hyperbolic, but I agree there is a real problem underlying it.
My point was that people should base their opinions on CHS' claims on her evidence and arguments, rather than who she associates with.
My point was that people should base their opinions on CHS' claims on her evidence and arguments, rather than who she associates with.
Edit: I'm not trying to change your approach, I'm just being blunt about my opinions. I appreciate your open mindedness.