How is a platform that let's you say anything uncensored intolerant? If your definition of "tolerance" is forced censorship, then I don't think you would do so well in Karl Popper's proposed society.
If we aren't putting her in the white nationalist classification I'm not sure who does end up there.
How is a platform that let's you say anything uncensored intolerant?
That said, the OP is also not right to suggest that intolerance is simple to identify. Like the other comments here say, it's subjective.
Then again, most things in life are subjective. Society has to be pragmatic sometimes and ignore that. Otherwise everything, eg: the legal system, falls apart.
The right of self defense is and long has been defense against immanent physical harm, for the one who does not start the fight.